KIA Forte

Debut: 2009
Maker: KIA
Predecessor: Cerato / Spectra


The valuable experience of Peter Schreyer brought KIA a rare sense of design maturity...

Not many manufacturers can afford to build two cars for the C-segment. The fast-rising KIA is one of them. For European market, it has C'eed. For America, Asia and rest of the world, it has Forte (although Australia and New Zealand call it Cerato instead). Both cars have a lot of commonalities, such as the same 2650 mm wheelbase, but also quite a lot of differences. While C'eed is a hatchback, Forte is a conventional 3-box sedan. C'eed has a sophisticated multi-link rear suspension to please the demanding European drivers, while Forte can be equipped with larger engines to please the torque-hungry American. They even differ in the place of manufacture: C'eed is built in Czech Republic while Forte is produced back in South Korea. Nevertheless, both cars guarantee the same excellent value for money.

Forte is a good looking car. It was designed in the company's California studio under the guidance of Peter Schreyer, who left Audi and Volkswagen to head the design activity of KIA. Asian car design usually falls into one of these two camps - boring or flamboyant. Examples are Toyota Corolla / Auris, Nissan Bluebird Sylphy / Tiida / Sentra for the former and Mazda 3, Honda Civic and Mitsubishi Lancer for the latter. The valuable experience of Peter Schreyer brought KIA a rare sense of design maturity. It might not be as striking as some European designs from Ford, Citroen or SEAT, it is undeniably a balanced, high-quality and inoffending design. I particularly like its wedge shape, its headlamps and front fenders, which are very original. Its drag coefficient at 0.29 is also excellent for the class.


Although most plastic surfaces are grained, none of them are soft-touch.

Compared to the exterior, the interior design is rather ordinary. While it is far better looking and touching than the outgoing Cerato, it does not raise your interest like most European family hatches do. Although most plastic surfaces are grained, none of them are soft-touch. The hard steering wheel and gearstick feel cheap, as is the faux alloy trim on the center console of top model. The door panels simply look low rent. That said, to sit and travel this cabin is hard to fault. Its long wheelbase guarantees plenty of room front and rear, especially because the floor is flat. Seat comfort and driving position adjustment are faultless. Besides, in the tradition of Korean cars it provides plenty of standard equipments that normally reserved as options in rivals. At the back, you get a decent boot space at 415 liters.

The chassis of Forte is fairly conventional. 63 percent of its monocoque is made of high-strength steel in order to improve rigidity and crash worthiness without adding weight. NVH engineering follows the modern route to employ a subframe for mounting the front MacPherson strut suspensions. The rear is suspended by a torsion-beam axle. Electrical power steering, all-wheel disc brakes, ABS and stability control complete the picture.

The chassis of Forte is fairly conventional... with a torsion-beam axle.

There are four engines on offer. 128hp 1.6-liter common-rail turbo diesel, 124hp 1.6-liter VVT petrol, 156hp 2.0-liter VVT petrol and 173hp 2.4-liter dual-VVT petrol. The last two come from the "World Engine" family developed jointly with Mitsubishi and Chrysler. The large 2.4-liter engine is offered only for the North American market because elsewhere few people could afford its extra thirst. In the rest of the world, most sales are likely to concentrate on the two 1.6-liter engines, which are not offered in North America. Among them, the common-rail turbo diesel is more lovely for its strong performance, refinement and frugality. The 1.6 petrol is not short of power, but it needs rev to realize that, and it is noisy to do so. The 2.0-liter petrol is more refined, if not feeling particularly gusty. If you want instant torque, the long-stroke 2.4-liter will be a must. It is also the only engine here pairs with a 6-speed manual gearbox or 5-speed automatic. Other engines are provided with either 5-speed manual or 4-speed auto. A 2.4-liter Forte with 6-speed manual can take you from standstill to 60 mph under 8 seconds. That is the territory of warm hatches.


Up the pace on back roads, the initial feeling of nice body control fades out quickly...

Nevertheless, it lacks a chassis tuning to match. While the Forte steers and rides well enough for a family car, it is by no means entertaining. At first you may be pleased with its firm yet absorbent ride, which simulates European cars. However, rides over really broken surfaces and it instantly shows why a torsion-beam suspension can never replace an independent multi-link. Admittedly, its poorly sorted damping is also a major reason for its poor low-speed ride. Up the pace on back roads, the initial feeling of nice body control fades out quickly. You will beg for less body roll, more grip, sharper throttle response and a steering that really communicates with the black top. If you are keen drivers, you will be far better catered in a Mazda 3, Ford Focus or Volkswagen Golf, or even another KIA called C'eed.


 The above report was last updated on 11 Jul 2009. All Rights Reserved.
 

Forte Koup



Stylish Korean coupe sets to attack a territory until now dominated by Japnese coupes...

It is not easy to make a compact 4-seater coupe stylish. However, Peter Schreyer and KIA's California design studio managed to do so in Koup. There is a lot of tension in its body, as shown in the pronounced wheelarches, crisp shoulder lines, slim lights, bold bumpers and blacked-out 5-spoke alloy wheels. Compare with the equivalent Japanese offerings, it looks far more desirable. This is unquestionably the best effort by Schreyer since he joined KIA in 2006.

Under the sheet metal, however, this car is more or less the same as Forte sedan. Power comes from the same 156hp 2.0-liter or 173hp 2.4-liter four-cylinder engines, mated to 5 or 6-speed manual gearbox respectively, or alternatively 4 or 5-speed automatic. In 2.4-liter manual form, it should be capable of doing 0-60 mph sprint in 7.7 seconds. Just don't expect it to be quicker than the sedan, as their kerb weight are within a few kilograms. Despite of twin-continuous variable valve timing and 2-stage intake manifolds, the 2.4-liter engine is rather reluctant to rev to its 6500 rpm redline. The smaller engine doesn't feel as powerful as its figures suggested either.

The ECU calibration in the coupe is different from the sedan. At low rpm it has sharper throttle response in the attempt to thrill its driver. Unfortunately, this actually makes a smooth driving in traffic difficult. At higher rpm, the throttle response is rather slow, failing to respond to throttle blip during downshift. More tweaks have to be done. Transmission is not much better. The 6-speed manual gearbox is notchy compared with Japanese counterparts. The 5-speed automatic is programmed to enhance fuel consumption. Both fail to deliver satisfaction.


This is unquestionably the best effort by Schreyer since he joined KIA.

Predictably, the coupe hasn't altered the torsion-beam rear suspensions of the sedan except making it stiffer, as are the MacPherson struts up front. The stiff setup and 10 mm reduced ground clearance result in pretty good body control, but ride quality suffers on poor surfaces. Rivals on multi-link suspensions cope much better with the same roads. The electrical power steering of Koup gets heftier and quicker, though it still feels somewhat artificial. Overall, its handling is decent rather than outstanding.

With a lower roof line, the Koup sacrifices 33 mm and 64 mm front and rear headroom respectively. Its rear seats can accommodate people up to 5ft 10in, not bad for a small coupe. On the downside, the same gray hard plastic dashboard as the Forte is hardly desirable. It has yet to meet the quality standards of the class.

The Koup is primarily destined to the US market, where competition is rather loose. Its main rivals are only Honda Civic Coupe and the aging Toyota Scion tC. We don't expect it to be exported to Europe, as Proceed is already taking this role to rival countless of European hot hatches. Life seems far easier for the Koup.


 The above report was last updated on 19 Jul 2009. All Rights Reserved.



 Specifications  

Forte 1.6

Forte 2.0

Forte 2.4

Forte Koup 2.4

Show all

Hide all


General remarks

Layout
Chassis
Body
Length / width / height
Wheelbase
Engine
Capacity
Valve gears
Induction
Other engine features
Max power
Max torque
Transmission
Suspension layout

Suspension features
Tyres front/rear
Kerb weight
Top speed
0-60 mph (sec)
0-100 mph (sec)

Forte 1.6
Front-engined, FWD
Steel monocoque
Mainly steel
4530 / 1775 / 1460 mm
2650 mm
Inline-4
1591 cc
DOHC 16 valves, VVT
-
-
124 hp
115 lbft
5-speed manual
F: strut
R: torsion-beam
-
205/55R16
1187 kg
118 mph (est)
10.2 (est)
-

Forte 2.0
Front-engined, FWD
Steel monocoque
Mainly steel
4530 / 1775 / 1460 mm
2650 mm
Inline-4
1998 cc
DOHC 16 valves, VVT
VIM
-
156 hp
144 lbft
5-speed manual (6-spd auto)
F: strut
R: torsion-beam
-
215/45R17
1228 kg
130 mph (est)
8.5 (est) (9.2**)
(26.3**)
 
Forte 2.4
Front-engined, FWD
Steel monocoque
Mainly steel
4530 / 1775 / 1460 mm
2650 mm
Inline-4
2359 cc
DOHC 16 valves, DVVT
VIM
-
173 hp
168 lbft
5-speed automatic
F: strut
R: torsion-beam
-
215/45R17
1294 kg
132 mph (est)
8.6*
23.6*

Forte Koup 2.4
Front-engined, FWD
Steel monocoque
Mainly steel
4480 / 1765 / 1400 mm
2650 mm
Inline-4
2359 cc
DOHC 16 valves, DVVT
VIM
-
173 hp
168 lbft
6-speed manual
F: strut
R: torsion-beam
-
215/45R17
1292 kg
135 mph (est)
7.1*
20.3*

Performance tested by: *C&D, **MT

Copyright© 1997-2009 by Mark Wan @ AutoZine