|
|
Published
on 30
Jul 2014
|
All rights reserved.
|
|
Note: the
Genesis is renamed to Genesis G80 from 2016.
6 years ago, Hyundai
Genesis entered the global executive car market with high hope. It was
properly styled and engineered, made with up-to-date components and
technologies, and cost Hyundai US$600 million to develop. Its biggest
selling point was that it offered 5-Series level of space and contents
at 3-Series prices, so it must be a huge success? Of course not. As we
always know, it has never been easy for a brand without prestige image
to break into the luxury car market – Lexus knows how hard that to be.
The Genesis just lacked the styling, build quality and dynamic edges
seen on German, British and even Japanese premium cars to impress
executive car buyers, who are generally more demanding than buyers of
cheaper cars. Great value for money alone is not sufficient. It needs
to feel expensive and special to drive. Otherwise, it can only be seen
as supermarket cut-price items like Cadillac, Lincoln or Acura (or
Infiniti perhaps).
Now given a second chance, how does the Version 2.0 react? First, it
has the exterior styling upgraded massively. While the “Fluidic
Sculpture 2.0” design theme is more about marketing language, the end
product has a far more distinctive character than the old. Its shape is
so much sleeker and crisper. Its LED daytime running lights add an
extra sense of style. Its huge front grille is controversial though –
it would be polite to say it is a reminiscent of Audi’s single-frame
grille, or if you take a harsher view, its arbitary shape might just
happen on any Chinese luxury pretenders. Anyway, it still makes the new
Genesis special, and you can easily recognize it from 100 yards away!
The outgoing Genesis already established a solid basis of FR
powertrain. What the new car really needs to work on is refinement. To
do this, Hyundai benchmarked it against the current BMW 5-Series and
Mercedes E-class, and designed a body shell that comprises of 51.5
percent of high-strength steel so that its torsion rigidity is lifted
by 40 percent and exceeds its German rivals. A lot of sealing adhesives
and sound insulation are applied throughout the body to cut noise and
vibration. It works! In most circumstances on the road, the new car is
quiet and refined. Maybe no more than its best rivals but it is
certainly up there. The all-multi-link suspensions, adapted from the
old car, now pair with electronic continuous adaptive dampers and soak
up undulations on regular roads effectively, resulting in a smooth
ride, especially when cruising on highway.
Nevertheless, Hyundai forgot to benchmark its kerb weight against BMW
and Mercedes. Built on the existing platform that underpins the
heavyweight
Equus and Kia K9 / Quoris, the Genesis contains nearly no aluminum in
its monocoque structure (except the front suspension towers), while its
engineering has almost no concern for weight reduction – at least not
heard in its press release. Consequently, a V6 model tips the scale at
1900 kg whereas V8 can easily exceed 2 tons. That’s 200 kilos heavier
than the equivalent 5-Series and E-class! What does that mean? Slower
acceleration and less agility in corners.
Admittedly, the carried-over, all-naturally aspirated engines don’t
help. You have the choice of 3.3 GDI or 3.8 GDI Lambda V6 with 282 hp
and 315 hp respectively, or 5.0 Tau V8 with 420 hp. All are slightly
detuned for the sake of better low-end torque. The Hyundai V6s are no
match to the turbo/supercharged sixes of its European rivals, not only
for performance and flexibility but also refinement and sound quality
when approaching redline. Meanwhile, the V8 is fast as long as you
don’t see it as a performance choice, unlike 550i or E500. It is smooth
and quiet though. However, what really kills is their lack of
consideration for fuel economy, something should kill their chances for
success in European market.
Slightly better is Hyundai’s inhouse-built 8-speed automatic
transmission. While it is not as responsive as ZF unit, its operation
is mostly smooth.
We hoped Hyundai could improve its driver appeal massively in this
generation. At first our prayers seemed to be listened. The new car has
a Sport mode to play with, which can sharpen the dampers, steering and
gearshift. Its electrical power steering has variable ratio, and it
takes only 2.5 turns from lock to lock. The car was extensively tested
at Nurburgring during development. Hyundai also said it hired Lotus
Engineering to tune the chassis for European version. Sounds great, but
in reality you can’t feel the Lotus work in any way. This car still
biases strongly towards comfort. It rolls a lot in sudden change of
direction, and the neutral attitude shifts to terminal understeer if
you push hard (4WD version understeers even more). Switch to Sport mode
only stiffens the suspension by a tiny bit, not enough to transform the
handling. The steering might be quick, but you can never overcome its
numbness. Strangely, the superb ride found on highway does not survive
on rougher surfaces, as its suspension crashes over potholes and big
bumps. This mean it is not as good a back-road eater as a highway
cruiser.
Enough words on the dynamic side. In terms of showroom appeal, the
Genesis is actually quite strong. Not only the new exterior styling
turns head, the interior is also a nice place to sit. Benefited by a
body shell slightly larger than class norm, its cabin offers more space
than most rivals. While the dashboard design is conservative, it is
well built. Aside from some cheap plastics at the dash top, all
materials are rich while switches are nicely damped. The leather seats
look expensive and feel comfortable. The trims on roof and doors are
nicely made. The high-definition infotainment display and i-Drive-style
rotary controller are classy. There is also a lot of standard equipment
for the price it asked.
In the end, the Hyundai executive car still takes superior value for
money to lure buyers. Dynamically, it is still too weak to compete with
its European rivals. In terms of comfort and refinement, it cannot
match Lexus or Mercedes. There is still a long way to go before it can
be seen as a world-class player.
|
Verdict: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Genesis 3.3
|
2014
|
Front-engined,
RWD |
Steel monocoque |
Mainly steel |
4990 / 1890 / 1480 mm |
3010 mm |
V6, 60-degree
|
3342 cc |
DOHC 24 valves, DVVT
|
VIM |
DI |
282 hp |
256 lbft |
8-speed automatic
|
All: multi-link
|
-
|
245/45WR18
|
1900 kg
|
149 mph (limited) |
7.2 (est)
|
-
|
|
Genesis 3.8 (AWD)
|
2014
|
Front-engined,
RWD (4WD)
|
Steel monocoque |
Mainly steel |
4990 / 1890 / 1480 mm |
3010 mm |
V6, 60-degree
|
3778 cc |
DOHC 24 valves, DVVT
|
VIM |
DI |
315 hp |
293 lbft |
8-speed automatic
|
All: multi-link
|
-
|
245/45WR18
|
1930 kg
|
149 mph (limited) |
6.2 (c) / 5.9* (6.6*)
|
14.4* (16.2*)
|
|
Genesis 5.0
|
2014
|
Front-engined,
RWD |
Steel monocoque |
Mainly steel |
4990 / 1890 / 1480 mm |
3010 mm |
V8, 90-degree
|
5038 cc |
DOHC 32 valves, DVVT
|
VIM |
DI |
420 hp |
383 lbft |
8-speed automatic
|
All: multi-link
|
Adaptive damping
|
F: 245/40WR19
R: 275/35WR19
|
2040 kg
|
149 mph (limited) |
5.0*
|
12.3*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance
tested by: *C&D
|
|
|
|
|
|
G80 3.3T Sport (AWD)
|
2017
|
Front-engined,
RWD (4WD) |
Steel monocoque |
Mainly steel |
4990 / 1890 / 1480 mm |
3010 mm |
V6, 60-degree
|
3342 cc |
DOHC 24 valves, DVVT
|
Twin-turbo |
DI |
365 hp |
376 lbft |
8-speed automatic
|
All: multi-link
|
Adaptive dampers
|
F: 245/40WR19
R: 275/35WR19
|
2041 kg (2112 kg)
|
149 mph (limited) |
4.9* / 5.0*
|
12.1* / 12.5*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance
tested by: *C&D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright©
1997-2017
by Mark Wan @ AutoZine
|
|