|
|
Acura ILX
|
|
|
|
Debut: 2012
Maker: Honda
Predecessor:
No
|
|
|
|
Published
on 9
Jun
2012 |
All rights reserved.
|
|
Strictly
speaking this is
not the first time Acura expand to compact car segment. As early as the
1980s and 1990s it sold a good number of Integra in the North America.
However, as far as a dedicated product is concerned, i.e. not a
rebadged Honda, the new ILX is its first C-segment car. Acura's
marketing said the ILX targets at Generation Y – successful 20 and
30-somethings moving into the luxury car ranks. That means the same
crowd as BMW 1-Series, Audi A3, Mercedes A-class, Volvo S40 / V40 and
Lexus CT200h. Considering its less premium image and ingredient, I
would say Buick Verano, Volkswagen Golf and Jetta are more likely to be
its direct competitors.
An annual volume projection of 40,000 units means the car cannot afford
a dedicated platform, so it utilizes the underpinnings of Honda Civic
sedan and package it with all-new exterior and interior. The exterior
restyle is quite successful considering its limitations. It looks not
unlike an Infiniti G35, albeit in a smaller package. A longer bonnet,
extended front overhang and a crease line rises over the rear fender
give it a false impression of rear-wheel drive, which is what it needs
to appear classy. Less remarkable is the detailed design at the nose
and tail, which doesn't look as high-quality or tasteful as its
European counterparts. Therefore the pursuit of premium image is only
half accomplished.
Inside, the story is more or less the same. While the dashboard's
twin-cowl layout, conventional gauges and materials are all an
improvement from the Civic, it still looks cheap and outdated for a
premium car. There aren't many high-end equipment on offer, just the
usual Pandora internet radio, Bluetooth connectivity, voice-control
infotainment system and rearview camera. Only the optional active noise
cancellation system is worth mentioning. Cabin space is no better than
Civic's, as the 2670 mm wheelbase is carried over intact. It offers
just enough room for four 6-footers to travel comfortably.
The ILX offers 3 levels of powertrains. By far the biggest selling is
the 2.0-liter SOHC 16V engine mated with 5-speed automatic. The former
is the long-stroke version of Civic's 1.8-liter unit. It produces 150
horsepower and a peaky 140 pound-foot of torque, just enough to haul
the heavier car. The 5-speed auto sounds outdated, fortunately its
control is well tuned thus gearshift usually takes place at the right
moment. Another powertrain combo is the Civic Hybrid's IMA system and
CVT transmission. It consists of a fuel-sipping 1.5-liter engine and a
small electric motor to generate a system output of 111 hp and 123
lbft. Predictably, the car is very slow, taking more than 10 seconds to
go from 0-60 mph. The range-topping powertrain is also by far the most
desirable to us: 201 hp 2.4-liter DOHC 16V and 6-speed manual gearbox.
Yes, it comes from the sporty Civic Si and the larger Acura TSX. Plenty
of power and slick gearshift make it the most enjoyable to exploit
performance. The downside? It's an old-school rev-happy engine with
little consideration for fuel economy. EPA figures of 22 / 31 mpg rest
at the lower end of the segment. For comparison, a larger yet more
powerful BMW 328i returns 24 / 36 mpg.
To qualify for an entry-level premium car, the ILX should have improved
ride and handling over its Civic roots. It does. By retuning the strut
and multi-link suspensions and fitting Amplitude Reactive Dampers (a
kind of 2-stage mechanical adaptive dampers), the ride is more composed
over undulations and body roll is better resisted in hard cornering.
NVH is reduced by using more high-strength steel in the chassis to lift
torsional rigidity (up 18% front and 11% rear). Extra insulation and
laminated glass also contribute to a quieter cabin, if not completely
shut away tire noise. The steering gets a slightly quicker ratio and a
more rigid mounting to sharpen response. It is definitely better than
the steering on Civic, but its electrical assistance is still
overboosted for the like of keen drivers, and the feel is so-so.
Overall, the ILX is better to drive and travel than its platform donor,
but it is unlikely to worry the class best.
Considering its limited development budget, the ILX is not a bad
effort. It is the company strategy that disappoints. After a quarter of
a century Honda has yet to promote its Acura brand to the same premium
status as BMW, Audi, Mercedes and Lexus. Its exposure is still limited
to the North America, and its roots are further decoupled from Japan.
This mean the ILX can only be a small-scale project and it has no hope
to match the high-volume 1-Series, A3, A-class etc. on resources and
the eventual outcome.
The low volume also results in unfavourable cost basis. The ILX is only
a thousand dollars or so cheaper than a comparably equipped TSX, which
is roomier and nicer looking in my eyes. That is perhaps its biggest
problem.
|
Verdict:
|
Published
on 11
Feb
2015 |
All rights reserved.
|
|
ILX facelift 2015
|
|
The Acura ILX has always
been suffering from identity crisis. It is supposed to be a junior
luxury car, but everybody knows it is built on the component set of
Honda Civic. Before the birth of Mercedes CLA and Audi A3 sedan it
might be able to shift reasonable amount in the USA market. After
that, it is hopeless. A mid-life facelift this year attempts to
reignite that hope.
The 2015 ILX has undergone some surgeries to improve NVH suppression.
These include thicker side glass, a stiffer front subframe, reworked
suspension bushings, more sound deadening materials and the fitment of
Active Noise Cancellation system. Its chassis rigidity has been
improved by 12 percent. Outside, the styling is refreshed with new
grille design, bumper and slim LED headlamps. No, it’s still no
CLA-sexy or A3-graceful, but what else would you expect for an Acura?
The biggest news is the powertrain. Because sales projection gets
pessimistic, the powertrain choices are simplified to one. The
2.0-liter and Hybrid models are gone, leaving the 2.4-liter. Yet this
2.4-liter is a new engine. Chief differences include the use of direct
injection and a different i-VTEC system, which consists of intake
variable cam phasing and intake cam-switching VTEC mechanism. Besides,
it gets a 2-stage variable intake manifold to optimize torque output
across a wider band. (Note: this engine is derived the same
displacement unit serving Accord, but it gains the variable intake
manifold and has compression ratio lifted from 11.1:1 to 11.6:1, which
requires to drink premium fuel) Maximum power remains unchanged at 201
hp, but peak torque is improved from 170 to 180 lbft. It won’t match
its turbocharged rivals for low to mid-range torque, of course, but the
free-revving Honda VTEC motor guarantees a more enjoyable experience if
you intend to rev it hard, because it won’t surrender until 7000 rpm or
produce a coarse soundtrack at the upper end.
Another novel change is the new 8-speed dual-clutch transmission, built
by Honda itself and uniquely employs a torque converter to smoothen
take off. Its operation is smooth and responsive – at least in Sport
mode.
The handling is slightly improved by retuned suspension (stiffer rear
anti-roll bar), bigger brakes and the aforementioned stiffer front
subframe which offers a more rigid mounting for the steering rack.
However, the improvement is slim thus it is still not exactly a
driver’s car. The ride and acoustic refinement are noticeably improved,
but then again no match with a Volkswagen Golf.
The biggest problem remains to be its low-rent interior. Honda said it
added more high-quality materials but the outcome is not convincing.
Even if it did, I suppose the seriously outdated interior design would
not be compatible with classier materials. Ditto the new infotainment
system. Like that you can find on TLX and RLX, the system splits
functions into 2 LCD screens, which is unintuitive and even confusing
to use. The response of its software is also far from perfect. Without
a premium interior and modern electronic architecture, the baby Acura
is hopeless to steal sales from its German rivals. It seems that its
fate is already decided.
|
Verdict: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ILX Hybrid
|
2012
|
Front-engined,
FWD |
Steel monocoque |
Mainly steel |
4550 / 1795 / 1410 mm |
2670 mm |
Inline-4 + electric motor
|
1497 cc |
SOHC 8 valves, VVT+L
|
- |
Cylinder deactivation
|
Engine: 90 hp
Motor: 23 hp
Combined: 111 hp
|
Engine: 97 lbft
Motor: 78 lbft
Combined: 127 lbft
|
CVT
|
F: strut
R: multi-link
|
- |
205/55R16 |
1355 kg
|
112 mph (est) |
10.8 (est)
|
- |
|
ILX 2.0
|
2012
|
Front-engined,
FWD |
Steel monocoque |
Mainly steel |
4550 / 1795 / 1410 mm |
2670 mm |
Inline-4
|
1997 cc |
SOHC 16 valves, VVT
|
- |
- |
150 hp
|
140 lbft
|
5-speed automatic
|
F: strut
R: multi-link
|
- |
215/45VR17 |
1320 kg
|
129 mph*
|
8.3*
|
25.1* |
|
ILX 2.4
|
2012
|
Front-engined,
FWD |
Steel monocoque |
Mainly steel |
4550 / 1795 / 1410 mm |
2670 mm |
Inline-4
|
2354 cc |
DOHC 16 valves, DVVT
|
- |
- |
201 hp
|
170 lbft
|
6-speed manual
|
F: strut
R: multi-link
|
Amplitude reactive dampers |
215/45VR17 |
1350 kg
|
143 mph (est) |
6.9* / 6.4**
|
19.2* / 16.9**
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance
tested by: *C&D, **MT
|
|
|
|
|
|
ILX 2.4
|
2015
|
Front-engined,
FWD |
Steel monocoque |
Mainly steel |
4620 / 1794 / 1412 mm |
2670 mm |
Inline-4
|
2354 cc |
DOHC 16 valves, VVT, VVL
|
VIM |
DI |
201 hp
|
180 lbft
|
8-speed twin-clutch
|
F: strut
R: multi-link
|
Amplitude reactive dampers
|
225/40R18 |
1421 kg
|
140 mph (est) |
6.6*
|
17.2*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance
tested by: *C&D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright©
1997-2015
by Mark Wan @ AutoZine
|
|