You
won’t be wrong calling it a Commodore coupe. Everybody knows it is a
coupe
version of Commodore, just like the relationship between Peugeot 406
sedan
and coupe. However, Holden would rather name it after a 1968 coupe
which
is unheard to most of us - and ladies in their 40s will deny knowing
it.
Monaro’s chassis is purely Commodore, even without shortening wheelbase. However, Holden replaces nearly all body panels and windows, lowering the roof by 40mm, shortening the rear overhang and lowering the windscreen and fastback angle. The car looks particularly handsome from side and rear, although the nose is quite ordinary. Compare with Peugeot 406 Coupe, it looks big and less elegant. The interior is disappointing for looks and build quality. Once again, the hard-plastic dashboard is carried over from Commodore, just adding fake aluminium decoration. In the positive side, it has plenty of space front and rear, because the car is actually very big. If you expect a sportier handling and performance, you will be disappointed. The Monaro not only shares the same engines with Commodore, but the suspension setting is even softer than Commodore SS. It seems that Holden wants to make it a comfortable tourer like 406 Coupe or 3-series Coupe, but then again its semi-trailing arm suspensions prevent it from offering true supple and quiet ride quality. Strangely, steering ratio is tuned slower than the sedan to make it more progressive and less nervous. Push the car hard, it is really more composed. It will understeer safely at the limit, it will power slide under hard throttle, but something seemed missing: agility and sharpness. By coupe standard, it feels too big and heavy. There are two familiar engines - 230hp supercharged 3.8-litre V6 and 315hp 5.7-litre V8. The latter is definitely the better one, being powerful, torquey, good to ears while adding little weight. The Monaro is slightly heavier than Commodore, but given so much cubic-inches it should do 0-60 in under 6 seconds. That said, you need a M3 to beat it. Performance and
space are
what the Monaro excels, but it has too many flaws - a sticky 6-speed
manual,
an old 4-speed auto, weak brakes and poor brake feel, undesirable
interior,
poor quality ... most disappointing, it does not offer more excitement
than the Commodore, which is a fatal fault for a coupe.
|
The above report was last updated on 25 Nov 2001. All Rights Reserved. |
HSV Coupe - see 2005 updateThe conversion from Monaro to HSV Coupe is every bit predictable. Firstly, HSV transplanted its 342hp version of the GM LS1 V8 into the Monaro body. It comes with the same 6-speed gearbox and limited slip differential as a package. Then HSV replaced the Monaro’s slow and much-criticized steering rack with the original Commodore one, quickened steering response. Stiffer suspension setup, bigger brakes and a set of clothes designed by TWR (HSV’s mother company)’s Neil Simpson complete the package.That’s the HSV Coupe GTO. Priced lower than a BMW 330Ci, the HSV Coupe GTO is unique in the coupe world. No one else offers so much grunt for so little. Not even Nissan 350Z can match it in this respect. However, the Australian car is not as quick as the Z, blame to its 1.67 ton weight. According to company figures, it takes 6.3 seconds from rest to 60mph. To be honest, Coupe GTO offers no advantage over the equivalent HSV sedans. Its coupe bodyshell might be a little stiffer, but no lighter. They share the same engine, gearbox, steering and brakes. Even the suspension setting is no stiffer. On the contrary, you may be disappointed that it is set a little softer than HSV Commodore SS. However, cleverer damping eliminates the harshness experienced in the standard Monaro. For a 4-door sedan, its performance and handling are adequate. Unfortunately, for a 2-door coupe, we expect more. We hope it could be more agile in the twisty roads, but its sheer size and weight denies that. We hope it could be pushed towards the limit without loosing composure, but it understeers like a performance sedan. It does not encourage you to drive it towards the last two-tenth. We admire the rich and linear output of its 5.7-litre V8, what a pity the brakes of the GTO fade quickly after hard use. The steering, while more responsive than Monaro’s, needs more feel. The 6-speed gearbox has shorter throw than the Monaro’s, but shift action is still slow and rubbery. Lastly, we would like more performance to reinforce its giant-killer role. The fact that 350Z and Mustang Cobra offer higher performance for less money is not amusing to HSV’s fans. At least the performance and braking issue can be solved by the flagship GTS model. GTS employs the 402hp Callaway-enhanced V8 (first used in the Commodore GTS 300) and a set of huge brakes - 362mm disc with 6-pot calipers up front, 343mm with 4-pot at the rear. It might not challenge BMW M3 for performance and quality, but it is cheaper. Anyway, if I
insist to have
a HSV, I would choose the 4-door sedans instead. They feel as exciting
to drive as the best European rivals while costing a fraction, that is
the point. In contrast, the Coupe’s identity is less clear. It is
neither
the cheapest nor the best to drive. |
The above report was last updated on 9 Feb 2003. All Rights Reserved. |
Pontiac
GTO - see
2005 update
Pontiac
GTO is a moral victory to Australian motor industry. For decades,
Holden
relied on American design and technology from its parent company in
Detroit.
But time has changed. Today, General Motors can no longer build a
rear-drive
coupe as good and as cost-effectively as its Australian subsidiary.
While
GM was shutting the production line of its F-body cars (Pontiac
Firebird
and Chevrolet Camaro), Holden launched its first-ever self-developed
coupe,
Monaro. What a contrast.
|
The above report was last updated on 28 Nov 2003. All Rights Reserved. |
|
|
Vauxhall Monaro VXR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|