Dodge Charger


Debut: 2025
Maker: Chrysler
Predecessor: Charger (2005) / Challenger (2008)



 Published on 14 Feb 2025
All rights reserved. 


Electric muscle car both surprises and disappoints...


If muscle cars are nonsense, an electric muscle car sounds even more ridiculous. Somehow, I do love the concept of Dodge Charger Daytona very much. Think about it: as quick as some EVs go, they all look boring and similar to each other. Too much efficiency-oriented, too much shaped by aerodynamics and too much lack of emotions. Dodge Charger Daytona is not the same. You won’t expect an EV could look so much like a modern evolution of the 1968 Charger – even though it doesn’t look like the original Daytona at all. It is huge. It looks bold and brutal. It has that kind of magic that raises your pulse and blood pressure even before pressing the start button.

Yes, it is really huge, bringing you back to the good old days. 5.25 meters long, over 2 meters wide and 1.5 meter tall, a 3075mm wheelbase and a kerb weight of 2.6 tons… and yet this is just a 2-door coupe! Dodge will build a 4-door version to broaden its customer appeal, but that is another topic. There will be ICE version coming later this year, too, which employs the Hurricane 3.0-liter twin-turbo straight-six that is already serving some Jeep SUVs and Ram trucks and offer up to 550 hp. They will be called “Sixpack” instead of “Daytona”, but that is another story. In short, the Stellantis group STLA Large platform on which it is built is quite versatile.

Given so much length and width to work with, its designers managed to provide a spacious cabin without compromising the coupe’s look. Coke-bottle flowing waistline resembles the original Charger, ditto the full-width intake at the nose that is cleverly used as a Ferrari-style S-duct to generate downforce, as the EV does not need much cooling. Overall, it is a sleek design that hits the sweet spot between modern and retro, much better than the outgoing Challenger did.



A sleek design that hits the sweet spot between modern and retro.


Inside, you will find the most spacious cabin this side of a Rolls-Royce Spectre. The rear bench is truly for adults, as a 6-footer can sit behind another 6-footer with room to spare. Compared with a BMW 4-Series Coupe – its closest if unlikely cross-shopping rival – the Daytona’s rear seat offers 43mm more headroom and 69mm more legroom as well as significantly more shoulder room. It is also a lot roomier than its predecessor Challenger, if not quite as spacious as the outgoing Charger saloon. The trunk is huge at 646 liters and can be expanded further with rear seats folded. If still not enough, there is a small frunk up front. And yes, this is a hatchback, so putting big items into the boot is easy.

The front seats are wide and comfortable if not that hugging. They are mounted higher than normal, inevitably, but in return you have good visibility all-round. The wide and low-set dashboard looks good and suitably trimmed to feel much more expensive than its predecessors. There are more physical buttons than BMW for straightforward access, while Chrysler’s Uconnect 5 infotainment system is easy to operate. The 12.3-inch touchscreen is responsive, while digital instrument display (10.3-in or 16.0-inch depending on model) looks crisped and is configurable. Ambient lighting in dash and doors add to a premium feel, as do the optional panoramic glass roof and head-up display. This car is a night and day difference from the old LX platform cars.

All Daytona models employ the same electrical hardware including a 100.5 kWh (gross) underfloor battery and twin-motor all-wheel drive setup. The front motor can be disconnected to save energy, while the rear axle includes a standard mechanical LSD. Each power module is the same, comprising of a 335 hp motor, its own step-down gearset and inverter. In theory, maximum output should be 670 hp. However, Dodge deliberately restricts the output to create different models. Base model called R/T offers 496 hp and 404 lbft of torque, which includes a 40 hp overboost for 15 seconds by pressing the “Powershot” button on steering wheel. 0-60 mph is quoted at 4.7 seconds while top speed is limited to 137 mph. 317 miles EPA range is pretty useful, but the asking price of $62,000 is probably too much for this kind of performance, even though the Daytona is a lot of car for the money.


The most spacious cabin this side of a Rolls-Royce Spectre...


Pay an extra $13,000 will get Scat Pack model, unlocking the full 670 ponies and 627 pound-foot of torque, cutting 0-60 to merely 3.3 seconds although top speed drops back to 134 mph, curiously. It is slightly more expensive than a BMW M440i xDrive Coupe or Hyundai Ioniq 5 N, but considering the performance, drama and space it offers, it is actually quite competitive. The Scat Pack’s powertrain is just the same as R/T, but its chassis gets larger wheels and brakes, massive tires and dual-valve adaptive dampers to support the enhanced performance. Moreover, it gets Track mode, Drift mode and even Donut mode to play with. On the downside, mileage drops to 241 miles with all-season tires or 216 miles with summer tires fitted. Yes, muscle cars are never frugal, no matter ICE or electric-powered.

Both models run at 400V electrical architecture thus charging speed is pretty slow, peaking at only 183 kW. That’s why the upcoming Banshee model – supposedly the equivalent of Hellcat – will bring 800V battery and faster charging along with far more power and 2-speed transmission.

On the Road

Forget the slower R/T, let’s concentrate on the 670hp Scat Pack. Right from pressing the start button you’ll hear a V8 roars into life from the back. That’s the function of “Fratzonic Chambered Exhaust”, an artificial sound system that uses not only the cabin’s audio speakers but also a 600W subwoofer mounted under the trunk to generate fake exhaust note, mostly resembling a Hemi V8. I like this idea, as it gives the aural excitement EVs desperately needed, but the execution of Stellantis’ acoustic engineers is far from perfect. Sure, the noise is loud, and it changes from startup to idling to running across the rev range, but each stage appears abruptly as if sticking two very different sound profiles together, making it sounds fake. The idea is good, the hardware is right there, but all Dodge needs to do is the software side, hire better people from the sound/music industry to fine tune the sound profiles. As it is, the Fratzonic thing gets mostly negative comments from reviewers. Instead of abandoning it, I hope Dodge will keep working on it, because the potential is right there. Over the air update would be great.



The idea of Fratzonic exhaust is good, the hardware is right there, but all Dodge needs to do is the software side...

In normal driving, the Daytona feels good. Yes, it is heavy, but there is more than enough instant grunt to overcome its mass and propel the car to whatever speed you feel comfortable with on public roads. Maybe not as quick as its 3.3 seconds 0-60 mph time suggested, but still respectably fast for such a big coupe. Moreover, the way it accelerates or cruises doesn’t feel like a muscle car at all. On the contrary, it is remarkably refined, being quiet (if you turn off the fake exhaust) and smooth. The car feels solid, thanks to a chassis rigidity 50 percent higher than its predecessor. Wind noise is well insulated from the cabin. The all-round multi-link suspension with dual-valve adaptive dampers does a good job to offer a smooth ride, a night and day difference from the old car. The Daytona is surprisingly civilized, or even with some hint of luxurious motoring.

Push harder and the immense weight starts affecting its dynamics. It is still far more stable and accurate than either the old Charger or Challenger, as the center of gravity is lower and weight distribution approaches 50:50 (actually 48:52). There is less understeer for sure, and body control is better. This allows it to use more of the traction and grip generated by massive Goodyear Eager F1 tires. The car steers more willingly, although the steering is a tad light and remote. The brakes have adequate stopping power, but pedal suffers from a non-linear response typical to many EVs. Ultimately, with so much mass to take care of, the car will understeer. You might expect Drift mode could bring some fun in corner, but in reality it is very hard to sustain, because the rear motor is no more powerful than the front. All the computer can do is to turn off the front motor, leaving only 335 hp to propel a 2.6-ton car, so you can imagine not quite a drift machine. Let’s hope the Banshee flagship will use a bigger rear motor.

At this price level, the Charger Daytona no longer offers class-leading bang for the buck. Hyundai Ioniq 5N is just as quick, far more capable in corners and offers way more fun from its simulated power band and gearchange, though few people would cross-shop a large muscle car with a family hatch, especially when it looks so good. BMW M440i xDrive Coupe (or Gran Coupe) is simply too small and too ordinary. Ford Mustang is 2+2, while Mustang Mach-E is an SUV-crossover without any muscle car flavours. The Daytona has no direct rivals on the market, but succeed or not will depend on whether the existing buyers of muscle cars are convinced that it is a good replacement for Hemi V8, not just the fake noise.

Verdict: 

Specifications





Year
Layout
Chassis
Body
Length / width / height
Wheelbase
Engine
Capacity
Valve gears
Induction
Other engine features
Max power
Max torque
Transmission
Suspension layout
Suspension features
Tires
Kerb weight
Top speed
0-60 mph (sec)
0-100 mph (sec)
Charger Daytona R/T
2025
Front & rear motor, e-4WD
Steel monocoque
Mainly steel, aluminum
5248 / 2027 / 1496 mm
3073 mm
Electric motor x 2
100.5kWh battery
-
-
-
496 hp
404 lbft
1-speed
All: multi-link
-
All: 245/55YR18
2648 kg
137 mph (c)
4.7 (c)
-
Charger Daytona Scat Pack
2025
Front & rear motor, e-4WD
Steel monocoque
Mainly steel, aluminum
5248 / 2027 / 1499 mm
3073 mm
Electric motor x 2
100.5kWh battery
-
-
-
670 hp
627 lbft
1-speed
All: multi-link
Adaptive damping
F: 305/35ZR20; R: 325/35ZR20
2683 kg
134 mph (c)
3.3 (c) / 3.2*
7.6*


























Performance tested by: *MT





AutoZine Rating

General models



    Copyright© 1997-2025 by Mark Wan @ AutoZine