BMW Z4 (G29)


Debut: 2018
Maker: BMW
Predecessor: Z4 (E89)



 Published on 13 Dec 2018
All rights reserved. 


No more beautiful than the past, but at least it drives like a proper BMW now.


“Ugly” is the second name of BMW Z4. Since its birth 16 years ago, it raised countless of eyebrows all over the world. Its proportion, its lines and its details were all so ill-conceived. I thought nothing could be worse, but I was wrong, because the second generation Z4 looked even weirder. Not just its styling disgusted, its driving dynamics disappointed too. Too much understeer, too little steering feel, too slow the chassis response and too heavy it feels (blame partly to the retractable metal roof) are just part of the long list of its weaknesses. No wonder we rarely saw the Z4 on streets. Certainly a lot fewer than its predecessor Z3.

It is hard to understand why BMW, a brand once renowned for the slogan “Ultimate Driving Machine”, could be so poor at making sports cars. In my opinion, it has plenty of good ingredients to succeed, such as FR drivetrain layout, 50:50 weight distribution and some of the world’s greatest engines. The only explanation I can find is the use of the wrong people. Firstly Chris Bangle, then Adrian Van Hooydonk as its design boss. Great chassis engineers left to Mercedes, VW or even Korea. Replacing them are somebody keener to rest on the laurel rather than setting new standards, or those listening to the marketing guys’ demand for “broadening customer appeal” (i.e. softer, safer and more relaxing to drive). It wasted 2 long generations and 16 years.



New Z4 is much wider and stiffer. Handling is much improved, but not without vices.


We are glad that BMW is finally back to the right path recently. No, the Mk3 Z4 is not going to lure us back to its showroom, because it is still a very ugly car, no less than the last generation. However, at least it feels like a proper BMW to drive. Its steel-aluminum hybrid chassis is 30 percent stiffer than the old car’s, even though it ditches retractable hardtop and returns to soft top. Surprisingly, it is no lighter than the old car, but this can be explained by its new-found dimensions: it is 80mm longer and 74mm wider. Its front track is widened by a massive 98mm, undoubtedly helping handling. Struts suspensions are retained up front, but the rear is new 5-link axle. Despite the longer overall length, the wheelbase is shortened by 26mm to improve agility. Moreover, BMW engineers give it a more playful handling balance this time around. It rolls and understeers less in normal driving. Switch to sportier modes and push it harder, its rear end is keener to break loose, running into oversteer briefly before the stability control correct things. Previous Z4s have never felt so edgy.

Frankly, in less committed drives, the Z4 is not that much different from a regular BMW saloon. Its steering is mostly accurate but lacks geniune feel. It offers plenty of grip and feels secured to slice into bends. It tracks straight on highway. Its open top manages wind buffeting brilliantly. It is also quiet and supple in Comfort mode, more so than an SLC or TT Roadster. The open-top chassis feels rigid, without scuttle shakes and creaks.



Cabin is spacious for a roadster, if lacking sense of occasion.


When you really push it on a twisty back road, you will be aware of its added width and its weight. It is certainly not going to match an Alpine A110 for agility and feel, neither can it rival a Porsche 718 for that matter. You don’t feel like driving a bespoke sports car but just another version of BMW saloon. Although you sit lower in the cabin, the latter doesn’t feel much different from other BMWs. The cabin is wide and spacious for a 2-seater. The dashboard, console, tunnel and TFT instrument look like lifted straight from other production BMWs. For a niche roadster, it lacks the sense of occasion.

In short, the new Z4 handles and rides noticeably better than its predecessors, but there is still a huge gulf between it and its lighter, mid-engined rivals.

What it can beat them is engine and sound, especially the 3-liter straight-six turbo on M40i. It might be lightly improved from the last gen’s, keeping 340hp but upping torque from 332 to 369 lbft (American buyers are luckier as they get 382hp), there is no deny that BMW straight-six still offers the best combination of power, flexibility, smoothness and sound in the class. The straight-six rhythm is the sound of heaven, a sharp contrast to the uninspiring noise of Porsche four-cylinder boxer (still moan on the loss of flat-6 Boxster). The only regret is that the Z4 lets too few of the sound entering the cabin, and how dare its engineers use synthesized sound and speakers to fool you! Fortunately, this is an open-top car thus you can always choose to lower the roof and expose yourself to the real symphony.


BMW straight-six is still the best of the class, but now you can have it on Toyota Supra, too.


Lower down the range, there is a 258hp 2-liter turbo four or a 197hp version of the same engine, but if you buy an Z4, it has to be the straight-six.

Judging it purely on dynamics and practicalities, the Z4 might be worth 4 stars. However, a roadster is a niche product, thus styling is always one of the most, if not the most, important factor. Here, the new Z4 crashes. We always say styling is very subjective, but if 100% viewers call it ugly, maybe ugly is an objective conclusion.

If you hate its look but don’t wish to lose the very last chance on the market to buy a rear-drive sports car with a straight-six engine, you still have an option: Toyota Supra. The new Supra is engineered based on the mechanicals of the Z4, as BMW needed the partnership with Toyota to spread costs and make a viable business case, otherwise the Z4 line would have been dead. You can see it as a BMW with Toyota’s clothes, chassis tuning and, yes, it is strictly a hardtop coupe, which means either more rigidity or less weight. With a partner so generous yet so foolish, Toyota is lucky. Both cars are assembled by contract manufacturer Magna Steyr in Austria. BMW wants to keep its manufacturing partner alive after killing Mini Paceman.
Verdict:
Specifications





Year
Layout
Chassis
Body
Length / width / height
Wheelbase
Engine
Capacity
Valve gears
Induction
Other engine features
Max power
Max torque
Transmission
Suspension layout

Suspension features
Tires

Kerb weight
Top speed
0-60 mph (sec)
0-100 mph (sec)
Z4 sDrive30i
2018
Front-engined, RWD
Steel + aluminum monocoque
Mainly steel
4324 / 1864 / 1304 mm
2470 mm
Inline-4
1998 c.c.
DOHC 16 valves, DVVT, VVL
Turbo
DI
258 hp / 5000-6500 rpm
295 lbft /1550-4400 rpm
8-speed automatic
F: strut
R: multi-link
Adaptive damping
F: 225/50R17
R: 255/45R17
1415 kg
155 mph (limited)
5.1 (c) / 5.1*
13.2*
Z4 M40i
2018
Front-engined, RWD
Steel + aluminum monocoque
Mainly steel
4324 / 1864 / 1304 mm
2470 mm
Inline-6
2998 c.c.
DOHC 24 valves, DVVT, VVL
Turbo
DI
340 hp / 5000-6500 rpm (US: 382hp)
369 lbft /1600-4500 rpm
8-speed automatic
F: strut
R: multi-link
Adaptive damping
F: 255/35ZR19
R: 275/35ZR19
1535 kg
155 mph (limited)
4.3 (c) / 3.8*
9.1*




























Performance tested by: *C&D





AutoZine Rating

Z4



    Copyright© 1997-2018 by Mark Wan @ AutoZine