|
|
Published
on 2
Dec 2014
|
All rights reserved.
|
|
As the domestic
K-car market gets increasingly competitive, Suzuki finds it more and
more difficult to increase sales. Fortunately, overseas developing
markets provide great opportunities. In the past decade or so Suzuki
has been especially successful in India through its joint-venture with
Maruti. Its Alto – not to be confused with the smaller Japanese market
Alto – was hugely popular in India and was also exported to Europe. Now
that car is replaced by Celerio.
The Celerio has no ambition to be Smart or Fiat 500, because all it
wants is to satisfy the basic needs of motorists in developing
countries. It has to be cheap and highly practical to use. Frills and
expensive technologies are avoided as far as possible to keep cost down
and repairment easy. However, it is not as extreme as Tata Nano. It is
designed in a conventional way. Even the exterior styling is plain and
conservative. The mechanicals follows conventional wisdom of FF layout,
with suspensions consisting of MacPherson struts up front and
torsion-beam axle at the rear. It is derived from the wide version of
Suzuki's K-car platform. Its rack-and-pinion steering is assisted by
means of electric. The 1-liter three-cylinder gasoline engine is the
natural choice for fuel efficiency and production cost. Ditto the
conventional 5-speed manual gearbox or automated manual transmission.
European version gets 6 airbags (including side curtains) and ESP
fitted as standard. Nothing really surprises.
The grey interior is duller than the speech of communist
party leaders, and the shinny hard plastics are slicker than American
politicians. But after all this is a low-cost car and all these issues
are forgivable. Cabin space is quite generous for the A-segment. The
Celerio has an unusually long wheelbase of 2425 mm, 40 mm longer than a
Hyundai i10 or 65 mm longer than its predecessor. Moreover, its 1530
mm height and boxy profile make good use of the footprint to benefit
passenger space. 4 average size adults won’t complain for lack of head
or knee room, although the narrow body doesn’t allow fitting the 5th.
Boot space is class-leading at 254 liters. The driver sits high and
have excellent visibility on the road.
The car’s dynamics is decent. The three-cylinder motor codenamed K10C
is benefited from VVT and 12.0:1 compression ratio to enhance thermal
efficiency. It avoids knock by using dual injectors (which has
better cooling effect), revised water jacket shape, piston-cooling oil
jets and water-cooled EGR. Further helped by automatic stop &
start, the motor achieves an outstanding fuel economy figure of 78 mpg
and CO2 emission of merely 84 grams each
km. That’s the territory of
diesel or hybrid! Power output is a little disappointing at 68 hp
though, so performance is average. It has to be noted that Indian
customers are served with a cheaper alternative motor called K10B,
which comes without VVT, Dualjet and auto S&S. Its horsepower
output is the same, but torque suffers a little and fuel economy is
less remarkable. Both engines screams loudly when they work hard, but
in town they are refined enough. The 5-speed gearbox has a heavy
gearshift, while robotic manual is expectedly jerky.
Predictably, the cheap small car is not supposed to thrill its drivers.
Its suspension setting is soft so that it can effectively absorb
low-speed bumps commonly found on the roads of developing countries.
The steering is light in typical city car style, though the car
displays decent directional stability on motorway.
Overall speaking, the Celerio should satisfy the basic needs of small
car buyers who have limited budgets. However, it can hardly raise our
interest from the way it looks or drives. Its closest rival is Hyundai
i10, which is a much higher quality product.
|
Verdict: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Celerio
1.0 Dualjet
|
2014
|
Front-engined,
FWD
|
Steel monocoque |
Mainly steel |
3600 / 1600 / 1530 mm |
2425 mm |
Inline-3
|
998 cc |
DOHC 12 valves, VVT
|
- |
-
|
68 hp |
68 lbft
|
5-speed manual
|
F: strut
R: torsion-beam
|
- |
165/65R14
|
815 kg
|
100 mph (c)
|
12.9*
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance
tested by: *Autocar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General models
|
|
|
|
Copyright©
1997-2014
by Mark Wan @ AutoZine
|
|