Published
on 16
Dec 2016 |
All rights reserved.
|
|
The last Subaru
Impreza was only 5 years old but it felt outdated nearly from day one.
Mechanically it was not bad, but it cried for a modern packaging,
up-to-date electronics and safety features. So
Subaru has cut its lifespan short and replaced it with a new generation
(note: the existing WRX and STi models will soldier on for a couple
more years, but then, Subaru sells them as separate lines now). Mind
you, the 5th generation Impreza has just won Japanese Car of the Year
award,
beating strong rivals like Toyota Prius Mk4. It is the first Impreza
winning this title, and only the second Subaru doing so (the first time
was Legacy some 12 years ago). Is it that good? We shall
see…
At the first glance, the new Impreza has the old car’s odd styling
improved rather than overhauled. The old car’s low bonnet and large
windows remain, which is good, but the overall design is compromised by
fussy crease lines, some edgy elements and a straight waistline
such that it does not look as sleek as many new rivals. Neither is it
as premium-looking as Volkswagen Golf or Renault Megane, nor it is as
funky as Citroen C4 Cactus. In a market full of well-designed rivals,
the
Impreza looks rather unremarkable. Once again the car is available in
both
4-door sedan and 5-door hatchback form. The former looks a bit
conservative, while the latter looks too much like a station wagon.
Subaru should invest more into design talents.
The new car sees the debut of “Subaru Global Platform”, which is to
underpin all of the company’s new cars and SUVs with the exception of
BRZ sports car. This doesn’t speak much though, as Subaru has always
had one platform serving all its cars – it could not afford multiple
platforms like giant manufacturers. However, it is still nice to hear
the new platform has boosted chassis rigidity by 70 percent thanks to
using stiffer steel at key locations, stronger welding and structural
adhesives. This will improve handling and refinement undoubtedly.
Moreover, the new platform is compatible with hybrid and plug-in hybrid
powertrains for the first time (the relevant components will be
supplied by Toyota, which owns 16.5 percent stake in Subaru now),
although we don’t know whether the Impreza itself will get
electrification. In terms of size, the new car has its wheelbase
stretched by 25mm to 2670mm to benefit interior space. It is also
slightly longer and wider, if no taller. Center of gravity has been
lowered by 5mm. Meanwhile, kerb weight, according to our figures, gains
between 40 and 50 kg depending on models, which is the only regret.
Outside, thanks in part to active grille shutter, drag coefficient
drops to 0.29, pretty good for the class.
While bones and skins are new, the legs and organs seem much the same
as before. The MacPherson-strut front suspensions and multi-link rear
suspensions are carried over from the old car, although predictably
retuned to take advantage of the stiffer new chassis. In particular,
the rear anti-roll bar is now mounted at the monocoque instead of rear
subframe to reduce distortion thus improve precision. This results in
less body roll, which is claimed to be reduced by 50 percent. To
improve steering response, the rack’s gearing ratio has been tightened
from 16:1 to 13:1, the same as BRZ. Its electric assistance is also
retuned. Like last generation, lesser Imprezas are driven by front
wheels, but most buyers are likely to choose the so-called "Symmetrical
All-Wheel Drive" system, which is carried over from the old
car. It has an electronic-controlled multiplate clutch incorporated at
the
rear of the CVT to engage the rear axle depending on
traction demand. In case the car runs into under or oversteer (although
the latter rarely happens), the new brake-actuated torque vectoring is
going to sort things out.
|
Despite the
familiar
suspension and drive system, the new Impreza does drive better than the
old car. The stiffer chassis results in a more composed ride and better
noise absorption although the suspension setting is quite sporty (in
case of Sport model with stiffer dampers and 225/40R18 tires). With
AWD, there is
abundance of traction and grip on offer. Body roll is much reduced and
understeer occurs later. The quicker steering improves turn-in and is
more enjoyable, although it is not the best electrical rack in terms of
feedback. Ford Focus and Mazda 3 are still better driver’s cars, but
the Subaru is not much behind.
Unfortunately, the powertrain is less remarkable. The 2-liter FB20
boxer engine is said to be 80 percent new as it gets direct injection
(finally!), a stiffer and 12 kg lighter block, but the outcome is only
4 extra horsepower at 154 hp, while maximum torque is even unchanged at
145 lbft. In the fields of turbocharged rivals, its power delivery is
weak and peaky. 0-60 mph should take nearly 9 seconds. Winding back 2
generations ago, the Impreza already did that in less than 8 seconds,
albeit with a 2.5-liter engine. If that’s not bad enough, you can try
the JDM car’s 1.6-liter base engine, whose 115 hp / 109 lbft output
should challenge your patience in overtaking or hill climbing. Sadly,
Subaru is not offering the 1.6-liter DI turbo engine in Levorg to the
Impreza.
Part of the problem is attributed to the chain-driven Lineartronic CVT,
which is mandatory in Japan and will probably take 90 percent sales in
the US market (the remaining goes to an outdated 5-speed manual). To
eliminate rubberband effect, it has a paddle-shift manual mode that
provides 7 artificial ratios, and it will automatically hold the gear
ratio under heavy throttle to simulate a 7-speed automatic.
Nevertheless, the time lag between noise and acceleration is never
fully rectified. For a car emphasizing driver appeal, the use of CVT is
a wrong decision. It just robs driving fun. Besides, the CVT also
generates some whine at higher revs to hurt the otherwise good
refinement.
On the plus side, the cabin is a much more enjoyable place than the old
car’s. The extra wheelbase and width give the interior more shoulder
room and rear passenger legroom (29mm). The cabin design is more
stylish, if still too conventional. Although it is not going to be
renowned for build quality, the materials and trims look and
feel more decent than the past, especially with the leather trims on
top models. As always, the Subaru cabin is high on outward visibility –
thanks to slim pillars, low waist line and large windows – and
ergonomics. The instrument is simple and clear, the driving position is
fundamentally good, switches and controls are logically placed. Unlike
some rivals, it keeps the hardware switches for audio and air-con for
easier access. There are 2 displays on the center console, the upper
one is a driving information display, while at the center is the
touchscreen of infotainment system, measuring 8-inch or 6.5-inch
depending on models. While Subaru’s infotainment system is hardly
class-leading, at least it is responsive and easy to use. Overall, this
cabin offers competitive space, decent technology and build quality, so
it is no longer a deal breaker.
In terms of safety features, the new EyeSight package includes adaptive
cruise control, lane departure warning, blindspot warning and automatic
emergency braking. In other words, pretty competitive.
At the back, access to the boot is also improved by widening the boot
lid aperture by 100mm, which necessitates the rearrangement of
taillights. With rear seat folded, the hatchback offers more luggage
space than most rivals. It should be, considering its station wagon
look.
That said, the new Impreza is still hardly an obvious choice in the
class. If you go for driver appeal, you might want a rival with more
power and better gearbox. If you want comfort and refinement, there are
many rivals that ride smoother and feel more expensive. In any cases, a
more stylish look would be welcomed. Still, it could form a solid basis
for the upcoming WRX and STi. As a family car, however, it is not quite
up to
the standards of class leaders.
|
Verdict: |
|