|
|
Published
on 31
Oct 2013
|
All rights reserved.
|
|
As suggested by its
name, i10 is the entry-level model offered by Hyundai in the European
market. The outgoing, first generation i10 was neither outstanding nor
eye-catching, but it was versatile enough to satisfy most buyers who
sought a decent city car at a reasonable price. European motoring
journalists generally liked its well sorted chassis, nice engines and
spacious cabin, not to mention the generous equipment and 5-year
warranty. No wonder it sold well in Europe. However, more demanding
buyers might dislike its dull look, basic interior and excessive noise,
which fell short of the standards set by Volkswagen Up and new Fiat
Panda. The new i10 is an answer to these criticisms.
Designed by Hyundai's European HQ in Rüsselsheim, Germany and
assembled in Turkey this time around, the new i10 is set to please
European taste. It looks really stylish – far sportier and more
expensive-feeling than the old car. There is some Renault Clio in its
body-side black plastic decors, but the nose is unmistakably Hyundai.
Although VW Up and Fiat Panda have stronger character in their designs,
you can't deny that the Hyundai is attractive in its own right.
The car shares platform with Kia Picanto again. Its 2385 mm wheelbase
is just 5 mm longer than the outgoing generation, but more important is
65 mm added to its width and 80 mm added to the overall length,
guaranteeing generous shoulder room and luggage space. Height is cut by
50 mm, but it still stands tall at 1500 mm, so headroom is never an
issue. This is one of the few A-segment city cars that can take four
six-footers for a reasonably long trip.
The new monocoque chassis gains 27 percent in torsional rigidity,
thanks to the fact that the usage of high-strength steel is increased
from 9 to 29 percent. To reduce NVH, it introduces a lot of counter
measures, such as a larger hydraulic engine mount, a triple-layer
bulkhead with sound-deadening panel and dual-door seals. Meanwhile,
wind noise is cut by carefully shaping the door mirrors and relocating
the antenna towards the rear. The sleeker body shape, with Cd lowered
to 0.31, also helps cutting wind noise.
The cabin is a vast improvement from the old car. Although soft-touch
materials are absent (few in this class could afford), the dashboard is
nicely grained and it is shaped and colored to look interesting. The
two-tone
color scheme lifts the ambience a lot from the usual black environment
you would find on cheap cars, though not as funky as Panda or as
tasteful as Up. The air vents and switches don't look cheap. The center
console is sited high and at an angle convenient for use. The only
complaint is the lack of sat-nav/infotainment system option, which
could be a
missed opportunity. Apart from class-leading
interior space, the boot is also the biggest in class at 252 liters –
beating Volkswagen by 1 liter.
Both "Kappa" petrol engines are carried over from the old car as they
were just added in 2011. No matter the 1.0-liter three-pot or the
1.25-liter four-cylinder, they employ aluminum block and
dual-continuous variable valve timing – this makes Fiat's 8-valve
1.2-liter look ancient. That said, their 66 hp and 87 hp output are
nothing special. Ditto the performance they offer. On the plus side,
the 3-cylinder is surprisingly smooth and its characterful noise is
well isolated from the cabin. The 4-cylinder has a more linear power
delivery and offers more punch for overtaking, but its
advantage over the smaller engine is not obvious in city driving. Both
engines hook up to a decent 5-speed manual gearbox.
On the run, you will find its engine noise, wind noise and road noise
are all markedly reduced so that it is now among the most refined cars
in the class. Meanwhile, the ride and handling continues to shine. It
hits the right balance between body control and ride comfort. The ride
is supple on all but the poorest roads. There is a bit body roll but by
no means excessive for a city car. The all-disc brakes are strong. Keen
drivers may prefer Volkswagen Up for its more direct steering feel, but
the Hyundai's electrical helm is still decent, offering light and
linear weighting.
Such an all-round package should bring greater sales success than the
old car and present serious threat to Volkswagen and Fiat. However,
what the i10 still lacks is a distinctive character. It neither looks
special nor it innovates in any area. Perhaps I might be asking too
much for an A-segment small car, but I always believe a class leader
should be more than just an all-rounder.
|
Verdict: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i10 1.0
|
2013
|
Front-engined,
FWD |
Steel monocoque |
Mainly steel |
3665 / 1660 / 1500 mm |
2385 mm |
Inline-3
|
998 cc |
DOHC 12 valves, DVVT
|
- |
- |
66 hp |
69 lbft |
5-speed manual
|
F: strut
R: torsion-beam
|
- |
175/65R14 |
858 kg
|
96 mph (c) |
14 (est)
|
-
|
|
i10 1.25
|
2013
|
Front-engined,
FWD |
Steel monocoque |
Mainly steel |
3665 / 1660 / 1500 mm |
2385 mm |
Inline-4
|
1248 cc |
DOHC 16 valves, DVVT
|
- |
- |
87 hp |
88 lbft |
5-speed manual
|
F: strut
R: torsion-beam
|
- |
175/65R14 |
866 kg
|
106 mph (c) |
11.6 (est)
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance
tested by: -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright©
1997-2013
by Mark Wan @ AutoZine
|
|