|
|
Published
on 24
Mar 2016
|
All rights reserved.
|
|
You might not
notice, Hyundai Elantra is rising to be one of the best selling cars in
the world. Last year, 811,000 units of Elantra (or Avanti, as it is
called in Korea) were sold worldwide. Although this number comprises of
old and new generations, it is still a remarkable achievement. What
makes the Elantra successful is obviously its great value for money –
it offers a lot of space and features for very reasonable money – but
since the last generation it also gets more desirable, placing styling,
packaging and even performance on high orders. It has to do so, because
the Korean needs to go upmarket in order to offset its rising
development and production costs and keep itself safe from the
competition of developing countries. The path is just the same as what
Japanese car makers did from the late 1980s. Also like the Japanese, in
quest of upmarket status it turns to a more conservative approach,
adding
maturity instead of creativity to its cars. That is a little bit sad.
Launched in Korea late last year, the 6th generation Elantra / Avanti
has gone on sale in China and USA recently. These 3 are by far its
biggest markets, no wonder it is once again assembled in each of these
countries. Compared with the last generation, its exterior design has
evolved to be a little more matured without altering the sleek profile.
The prominent hexagonal grille looks more premium, and I'm sure Audi
won't be happy with it. The side and rear sculptures become neater and
more
straightforward, though the fast roofline is carried over from the old
car, while drag coefficient drops further to a remarkable 0.27.
Overall, it is a
handsome design, if a bit too predictable and not quite as inspiring as
the old car.
The new car is built on the old platform, sharing its 2700 mm wheelbase
as well as the very basic suspension consisting of MacPherson struts up
front and torsion-beam axle at the rear. However, there are still
plenty of improvements can be made. The weakest link of the old car was
its lack
of chassis rigidity and NVH suppression, both contributed to poor
running refinement. This time Hyundai spent a lot more effort into this
area. Its chassis gains 30 percent in torsional rigidity, thanks to
using significantly more high-strength steel (up from 21 to 53 percent
by mass of the body-in-white)
as well as extensive use of structural adhesives. The front suspension
is now mounted on a subframe to absorb NVH. The rear suspension has its
dampers repositioned more vertically to better absorb road shocks. To
cut down noise level, there are thicker windscreen and front side
glass, sound-absorbing wheel well liners and smaller holes in the
firewall and dash structure. Thanks to the high-strength steel, its
kerb weight is virtually unchanged.
The new Elantra is slightly longer and wider again than its
predecessor. Although it is marketed as a "compact car" in the America,
it is not exactly compact. Like the recent Honda Civic sedan and
US-version of Toyota Corolla, its 2700 mm wheelbase offers rear legroom
that could rival some D-segment sedans. The interior is spacious. That
said, the fastback roofline means headroom is marginal for 6-footers.
The interior design is a sharp contrast to the old car's. Infected by
Sonata, its dashboard is square,
conservative and uninspiring, with no imagination at all. On the plus
side, the build quality is undeniably improved. Although not quite the
best of the
class, it might be better than its key rivals Honda Civic and Toyota
Corolla (both topple the Elantra in US sales chart). Soft-touch
plastic covers the top of the dash, if not elsewhere. The faux alloy
trims look decent. Predictably, equipment level is quite high, and the
electronics are up to date.
Such an air of maturity can be felt in the driving as well. On the
road, the new car's improved refinement is evident. Its chassis finally
feels as stiff as a modern car should. The ride is much more composed,
although damping could be more polished at speed. The cabin is well
insulated
from wind and road noise. Refinement isn't far off from the best
European or Japanese rivals. Well done.
Handling is less remarkable. It is competent to handle most driving
situations. It is safe and easy to drive as most buyers want. However,
there is not much fun in the process. Its cornering limit is not
especially high to inspire excitement. The chassis response is not
especially keen to sudden changes. The steering is numb. In short, it
is not intended to be a driver's car.
Depending on markets, you can choose among 4 power units: the familiar
1.6 GDI with 130 hp, a new 1.4 T-GDI turbo with similar power but more
torque, a new 2.0 Atkinson-cycle engine with 147 hp and a 1.6 turbo
diesel with 136 hp. Experience tells us the turbo diesel should be the
best performer in the real world and also the most refined, so it is
worth the premium. Moreover, it is mated with a 7-speed twin-clutch
gearbox. The 1.4 T-GDI also shares this gearbox. Like a diesel, it
offers strong mid-range punch but there is some turbo lag low down. It
is not as sweet as, say, Fiat 1.4 MultiAir turbo or Volkswagen 1.4 TSI,
and it makes significantly less horsepower. The US-bounded 2.0
Atkinson-cycle engine offers more power, but it is linear rather than
punchy. At least, it is much quieter and nicer to listen than the old
car's 1.8-liter unit. The 6-speed automatic works seamlessly.
As seen, the strength of new Elantra is comfort, refinement and space,
though they are not good enough to set new standards. Among its key
rivals, Honda Civic is the closest match, but the Civic is also a bit
more youthful and fun to drive. A characterless all-rounder is no
longer deemed to be sufficient these days. Hyundai needs to think again
what messages it wants to deliver with the Elantra.
|
Verdict: |
Published
on 7
Nov 2016
|
All rights reserved.
|
|
Elantra Sport
|
Hyundai finally
gives Elantra a performance treatment. It receives the 204-horsepower
1.6 direct injection turbo engine of Veloster and Kia Pro_Cee’d GT,
pairing it with either a 6-speed manual or 7-speed DCT gearbox, which
sounds delicious enough. Moreover, the cheap torsion-beam rear axle has
been replaced with a multi-link setup – presumably transplanted from
Pro_Cee’d. Its suspension’s front and rear springs have been stiffened
by 14 and 22 percent respectively, while damper rate is increased by 30
percent. The footwork consists of 18-inch alloy wheels shod with 225/40
rubbers and larger brakes. Finally, the steering rack is also quickened
a little bit. Outside, the front end gets pseudo intakes under the
headlights to make a sportier look, while twin-exhaust and diffuser
fins improve aesthetic at the rear. Inside, there are new bucket
leather seats and a flat-bottom steering wheel to distinguish from
lesser models.
All these sound promising, but the Elantra Sport is no Pro_Cee’d GT,
let alone Golf GTi, Ford Focus ST or Seat Leon Cupra. Its steering is
light and numb, delivering no sense of fun at all. The suspension is
firm enough to keep roll in check, but the car is prone to understeer
when pushed. The Hankook tires are not renowned for grip. The ride
lacks the fluidity of its rivals. The manual gearbox is troubled by a
vague shifter action and a too-light clutch pedal. The DCT is slightly
better, but its response is no match with DSG or the like. In short,
its
chassis and control setup are half-baked.
Performance is not great either. Admittedly, we don’t expect a
1.6-liter turbo to deliver Ford Focus RS level of performance, but
while Peugeot is capable to squeeze 270 horses out of the same
capacity, Hyundai’s 204 hp output looks rather tamed. Moreover, the
3-box Elantra is longer and heavier than its Kia cousin thus its
performance is hampered. Even by the standard of “warm hatches”, it is
relatively weak.
On the plus side, the Hyundai is cheaper than most others, of course.
However, in return you get a car that is not fast enough to raise your
pulse, not fun enough to drive in the twisty and not comfortable enough
to do long distances. While styling is very personal, all agree that
its cabin looks conservative and feels cheap compared with the class
leaders. Hyundai once again fails to make a good sporty compact car.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elantra 1.4 T-GDI
|
2016
|
Front-engined,
FWD |
Steel monocoque |
Mainly steel |
4570 / 1800 / 1440 mm |
2700 mm |
Inline-4
|
1353 cc |
DOHC 16 valves, DVVT
|
Turbo |
DI |
128 hp |
156 lbft |
7-speed twin-clutch |
F: strut
R: torsion-beam
|
- |
195/65R15 |
1294 kg
|
120 mph (est)
|
7.8*
|
21.9* |
|
Elantra 2.0
|
2016
|
Front-engined,
FWD |
Steel monocoque |
Mainly steel |
4570 / 1800 / 1440 mm |
2700 mm |
Inline-4, Atkinson-cycle
|
1999 cc |
DOHC 16 valves, DVVT
|
- |
- |
147 hp |
132 lbft |
6-speed automatic
|
F: strut
R: torsion-beam
|
- |
225/45R17
|
1305 kg
|
127 mph (est)
|
8.5*
|
23.0* |
|
Avante 1.6CRDi
|
2015
|
Front-engined,
FWD |
Steel monocoque |
Mainly steel |
4570 / 1800 / 1440 mm |
2700 mm |
Inline-4, diesel
|
1582 cc |
DOHC 16 valves
|
VTG turbo
|
CDI |
136 hp |
221 lbft |
7-speed twin-clutch
|
F: strut
R: torsion-beam
|
- |
225/45R17
|
1380 kg
|
124 mph (est)
|
9.0 (est)
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Performance
tested by: *C&D
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elantra Sport
|
2016
|
Front-engined,
FWD |
Steel monocoque |
Mainly steel |
4570 / 1800 / 1440 mm |
2700 mm |
Inline-4
|
1591 cc |
DOHC 16 valves, DVVT
|
Turbo |
DI |
204 hp / 6000 rpm
|
195 lbft / 1500-4500 rpm
|
7-speed twin-clutch |
F: strut
R: multi-link
|
- |
225/40R18 |
1360 kg
|
143 mph (est)
|
7.0 (est)
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance
tested by: - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright©
1997-2016
by Mark Wan @ AutoZine
|
|