|
|
Honda Fit / Jazz
Debut: 2008
Maker: Honda
Predecessor: Fit / Jazz (2001) |
|
Can the pearl of the east beat the
jewel of the west ?
|
The first generation Honda
Fit
was born in late 2001 and became a runaway success. It was renowned for
a clever packaging that maximized interior space out of a small
exterior and a flexible seating / luggage-loading arrangement. Its
success extended to Europe and even United States, where it is called
Jazz. More than 2 million units of Fit and Jazz were sold worldwide
until the Mk2 arrived in late 2007. Overseas market waited a further
three quarters to get their hands on the new car. Unfortunately, by
that time Ford had introduced its ground-breaking new Fiesta. Can the
pearl of the east beat the jewel of the west ? We shall see…
The new Fit / Jazz has grown a little bit – compare to the old car it
is 55 mm longer and 20 mm wider, although the 1525 mm height (which is
tall by class standard) is unchanged. Wheelbase has been stretched by
50 mm to a total of 2500 mm. It is about the same size as Mazda 2 thus
is smaller than European rivals like Renault Clio, Peugeot 207 and Fiat
Grande Punto. It is also a little shorter and narrower than the new
Fiesta. However, none of these cars could match its interior volume.
Its windscreen has been pushed further forward and steeply angled so
that it becomes a monospace. Larger window area makes it look smarter
and lighter. Style has been enhanced by sharper design of headlamps and
front intakes, while a sudden drop in the roof line behind the rear
door is a strange new feature. Front quarter windows have been added to
reduce blindspots.
|
|
|
Benefiting from a larger windscreen and full-length panoramic glass
roof, the cabin feels more airy than ever. Visibility is great all
round, a rare achievement these days. We must praise the thoughtful
features Honda built into this little car. Although the dashboard
design is far from classy, the trim is plain dark and it employs far
more hard plastics than European counterparts, its ergonomics and
features are hard to fault. All frequently used controls and switches
are placed at the upper half of the dash and console for easy reach.
All controls, no matter steering, clutch and gearshift, have a light
and easy going manner. There are plenty of storage cubbies in the cabin
and as many as 10 cupholders so that you can make your own cocktail
while traveling.
Two things mark it out from the crowd: space and versatility. The Fit /
Jazz can really take four big guys for long journey (five would be a
squeeze because of its limited width anyway). The longer wheelbase
gives rear passengers 40 mm extra knee room. In addition to a tall
roof, rear passengers must love this car more than its European rivals.
As for luggage space, it is simply in a class of its own. Like the Mk1,
the new Fit / Jazz has its fuel tank located under the front seats so
to leave space underneath the rear seats for the sake of versatility.
If you want to carry a tall item, e.g. a small Christmas tree, you can
flip up the rear seat cushion and put the tall item on the rear floor.
Alternatively, by one action you can fold and drop the rear bench onto
the floor to reveal a flat yet low cargo loading area, which could
swallow as much as 883 liters. Even with all seats in place, its boot
still measures a class-leading 399 liters. Moreover, the hatchback door
is large and the load sill is low, very convenient to use. The boot has
a flexible parcel shelf and an additional storage area under the boot
floor to store tiny items… Oh my God ! Is this a supermini or a van ?
Okay,
we are actually not too concerned about luggage space. What we care
most is how good it drives and how great it feels, so let’s concentrate
back on the mechanical aspects.
The new Fit / Jazz still follows the format set by its predecessor.
This mean it rides on suspensions consisting of struts up front and
torsion beam axle at the rear, although the bushings and fine tuning
have been improved. Electrically assisted steering continues to serve
the car. The chassis is 160 percent stiffer than the old one, thanks to
higher percentage of high-strength steel used and other structural
reinforcement. Although Honda said weight saving measures limited its
weight increase to merely 10 kg, a comparison between the old and new
spec. will find it is actually 30-70 kilograms heavier engine by
engine. This make it slightly heavier than the new Fiesta too.
In the engine compartment, you will find either a 1.3-liter SOHC i-VTEC
or 1.5-liter SOHC i-VTEC engine. Honda is playing with the label
“i-VTEC”. In these two engines, it means the conventional two-stage
intake cam profile-switching VTEC mechanism without variable
cam-phasing. In the 1.3 engine, the low speed cam simply shuts down one
of the intake valves in each cylinder, so it effectively becomes a
3-valve-per-cylinder engine. The purpose is to create swirl in the
combustion chamber to help mixing fuel and air. At higher rev, the 1.3
engine works as a 16-valve engine to produce 100 horsepower at 6000
rpm. The 1.5-liter engine has a normal fast/slow cam VTEC mechanism to
enable 120 horsepower at 6600 rpm. It sounds on a par with Fiesta’s 1.6
Ti-VCT engine, but it delivers less torque and requires some 4800 rpm
to reach the maximum. Both engines are major on smoothness and
frugality rather than performance.
|
|
|
The standard transmission is a 5-speed manual with Honda’s typical
slick gearchange. Japanese customers may specify a CVT with 7-speed
manual override (carried over from Mk1) while overseas customers are
offered with a 6-speed automated manual. Both are not responsive enough
to attract keen drivers.
On the road, the new Fit / Jazz displays adequate handling and ride.
While the old car suffered from a stiff ride, the new car has a
smoother ride and slightly better body control thanks to its stiffer
chassis, longer wheelbase and wider stance. However, it is not as well
insulated against noise as Fiesta and other European rivals –
admittedly, a spacious package always compromises insulation and
requires more sound deadening materials. On winding roads, its i-VTEC
engines need to be kept at above 4500 rpm to deliver sufficient punch.
This deteriorates its refinement too. The tall car generates more
understeer in corners and isn’t as tightly controlled as its European
rivals. Moreover, its electrical power steering remains light and numb
as the Mk1. As a result, the Honda is not as much fun to drive as
Fiesta, Corsa, Punto or Mazda 2. Its dynamics is not bad, but you
should look elsewhere if dynamics is your first priority.
However, the majority of customers might have different conclusions.
They will be attracted by its spacious interior, clever luggage layout,
smooth and easy driving manner, excellent fuel economy and dependable
reliability. These areas are what Ford Fiesta fails to match. On the
downside, it can’t match the style, cabin quality, refinement and
handling of the Fiesta. It’s up to you to decide which one fits you
best.
|
The
above report was last updated on 30 Sep 2008. All Rights Reserved. |
|
Fit (Jazz) Hybrid
|
With a lot of dedicated
components, hybrid cars need economy of scale to succeed. If you build
more than 400,000 hybrid cars a year like Toyota Prius, you will easily
enjoy thick profit. Cut that number by two-third, however, you will
find component unit costs hard to swallow. That is exactly what Honda
Insight facing. Now it is clear that the once highly anticipated hybrid
is not as popular as Honda hoped for. In order to relieve its cost
pressure, Honda utilizes the same IMA hybrid system on its highly
popular Fit (Jazz). The resultant Fit (Jazz) Hybrid should double its
production volume and drive down component costs significantly.
|
Few gains, few compromises.
|
The IMA system on Fit Hybrid is basically the same as that on the
Insight. It combines an 88hp 1.3-liter 8-valve engine (with automatic
stop-start and valve deactivation under no-load condition), a 14hp DC
brushless motor and a continuous variable transmission (CVT). With the
additional (58 lb-ft) low-rpm torque of electric motor, it offers
slightly brisker acceleration than the regular Fit 1.3, if not
comparable to Fit 1.5. The small motor and battery pack of IMA add only
50 kg to the car, so there is no discernible penalty to handling.
What this car does better than Insight is packaging. The battery pack
and power control module fit under the cargo floor of the regular Fit
as their cooling air ducts have been rerouted from the top to the side.
This mean the load bay is deep and the flexible rear seat arrangement
is unaltered. For a hybrid, its packaging efficiency is amazing.
Unfortunately, the flip side of few compromises is few gains. On
European combined cycle, the car manages only 63 mpg. CO2
emission is 104 grams per km, which means it is worse than many
European diesel mini cars. It might be harsh to expect it to match
Volkswagen Polo 1.2TDI Bluemotion, which achieves a class-leading
89g/km, but the fact that it fails to break into the 100g mark is
really disappointing, hybrid or not.
If you are a big fan of Honda Fit (Jazz), the Hybrid version might be a
wise purchase because it retains the strengths of the regular car while
boosting fuel efficiency. However, if you are looking for a really
economical / green car, you should look elsewhere. Honda, it's time to
rethink your hybrid strategy.
|
The
above report was last updated on 1 Jan 2011. All Rights Reserved. |
Specifications
|
General remarks |
Layout |
Chassis |
Body |
Length / width / height |
Wheelbase |
Engine |
Capacity |
Valve gears
|
Induction |
Other engine features |
Max power
|
Max torque
|
Transmission
|
Suspension layout
|
Suspension features |
Tires |
Kerb weight |
Top speed |
0-60 mph (sec) |
0-100 mph (sec) |
|
Fit 1.3 |
Front-engined, FWD
|
Steel monocoque |
Mainly steel |
3900 / 1695 / 1525 mm |
2500 mm |
Inline-4 |
1339 cc |
SOHC 16 valves, valve-deactivation (VTEC)
|
- |
- |
100 hp
|
94 lbft
|
5-speed manual (CVT)
|
F: strut
R: torsion-beam
|
- |
175/65R15 |
1074 kg (CVT: 1080 kg)
|
113 mph (c) |
10.7* |
35.2* |
|
Fit 1.5 |
Front-engined, FWD
|
Steel monocoque |
Mainly steel |
3920 / 1695 / 1525 mm |
2500 mm |
Inline-4 |
1496 cc |
SOHC 16 valves, VVT+L
(VTEC)
|
- |
- |
120 hp
|
107 lbft
|
5-speed manual (CVT with 7-speed)
|
F: strut
R: torsion-beam
|
- |
185/55VR16 |
1080 kg (CVT: 1100 kg)
|
120 mph (est) |
8.5** |
28.2** |
|
Fit Hybrid
|
Front-engined, FWD
|
Steel monocoque |
Mainly steel |
3900 / 1695 / 1525 mm |
2500 mm |
Inline-4 + DC electric motor
|
1339 cc |
SOHC 16 valves, valve-deactivation (VTEC) |
- |
- |
88 hp (engine)
13.6 hp (motor)
|
89 lbft (engine)
58 lbft (motor)
|
CVT
|
F: strut
R: torsion-beam
|
- |
175/65R15 |
1130 kg
|
100 mph (c) |
10.0 (c)
|
- |
|
|
Performance
tested by: *Autocar, **C&D |
Copyright©
1997-2011
by Mark Wan @ AutoZine
|
|
|