|
|
Published
on 21
May 2013
|
All rights reserved.
|
|
It is normal for a
coupe to be derived from a sedan. The last generation Bentley
Continental Flying Spur was on the contrary – it was derived from the
Continental GT. At that time, it looked a smart decision, because it
shared part of the beautiful style and most of the beautifully crafted
interior with the GT, while the high percentage of component
commonality (with the GT as well as VW Phaeton) allowed it to be priced
sensibly between mass production luxury cars (like Mercedes S-class)
and exclusive limousines (like Rolls-Royce Phantom). In the first year,
some 4271 Continental Flying Spurs were sold, so it seemed set to be a
big success. Unfortunately, that was also its best year. Sales
gradually dropped to 1764 units last year. Why didn't it work? The
answer is again its half-hearted origin. Because it was derived from
the coupe, it lacked the necessary ride quality and refinement to meet
the expectation of customers. Therefore, to improve comfort becomes the
first priority of the second generation.
It must be said that the new car is no longer a "Continental". In the
attempt to distant itself from the Continental GT and establish an
exclusive image, the new car is called simply "Flying Spur".
Unsurprisingly, its exterior styling is also given a more distinctive
character. Styled by new Bentley (and ex-Lamborghini) design boss Luc
Donckerwolcke, the car appears more elegant, with a more flowing waist
line, slimmer ends and a more upright radiator grille. The latter and
the bumper grille are given mesh treatment to appear classier. The new
LED headlights look more stylish. The aluminum front fenders have a
complex but elegant shape, and they are made by superformed technique.
At the back, the slimmer and squarer tail looks less bulky than before.
Well done, Donckerwolcke.
When you examine its technical specifications, you will come up with
the conclusion that it is not exactly an all-new design but an
evolution of the old car. Body dimensions are practically unchanged –
same width and wheelbase, just 5 mm longer overall. The mechanical
layout are also carried over – W12 engine, 4WD and adaptive air
suspensions. There are some improvements though. Its aerodynamic
coefficient of drag drops to 0.29. The new body is made slightly more
rigid, with torsional rigidity of 36,500 Nm per degree instead of the
old car's 35,000. Thank to the aluminum bonnet and front fenders and
composite boot lid, its kerb weight is reduced by 50 kg, although 2400
kg is still nothing to be proud of.
The Audi-sourced 4WD system now splits 40:60 torque front to rear under
normal conditions. The transmission is upgraded to ZF 8-speeder. The
twin-turbo 6-liter W12 engine gets the same spec. as Continental GT
Speed, so output increases to 625 hp and 590 lbft. This is the world's
most powerful 4-door saloon. With a magical top speed of 200 mph, it is
also the fastest. Acceleration from 0-60 and 0-100 mph takes 4.3 and
9.5 seconds respectively, 0.1 and 1 second faster than the old
Continental Flying Spur Speed. Meanwhile, fuel consumption is said to
be cut by 13 percent.
Inside, the interior looks familiar to the old car as well as the
Continental GT. They again share the same beautiful dashboard,
high-quality materials and switchgears. Nevertheless, the focus is
placed at the rear. Now with more than half the sales goes to China and
over 95 percent of its buyers there are driven by chauffeurs, the
Flying Spur has to please the rear seat occupants more than ever. Apart
from lots of space and comfy seats, it provides a WiFi touchscreen that
allows the boss to control audio/video, climate control, seats (which
is heated, cooled and massaged) and even display the dashboard dials or
sat nav map to monitor the progress. There are also fold tables and a
refrigerator behind the central armrest.
The old cabin used to be troubled by excessive noise, no matter from
the engine, road or wind. In response to criticisms, the new car gets
double-glazing windows, acoustic underfloor insulation panels and extra
sound deadening materials within the doors. Furthermore, enlarged rear
mufflers reduce exhaust boom by 12dB at 3000 rpm. To deal with the hard
ride, the suspension has been tuned softer – spring rates of the air
struts have been reduced by 10% front and 13% rear, while anti-roll
bars and bushings are softened, too. Ride quality is also improved by
using taller sidewall tires.
On the road, the Flying Spur is a lot quieter and more comfortable to
travel. While it is not ultimately as silent and supple as Rolls-Royce
Ghost, its refinement is good enough for a luxury limousine.
Inevitably, the softer setup means more lean in corners when the
suspension is set at the more comfortable modes, but the Bentley
corners better than the Rolls-Royce or anything expected for its size,
weight and luxury. That is not a surprise, of course, as Bentley is
always more driver-oriented than Rolls-Royce.
Don't get me wrong, it is by no means a driver's car like a Jaguar XJ.
Despite of its relative sportiness to RR, its sheer size and weight
still limit its agility on more challenging roads. Moreover, its lack
of communication is difficult to engage the driver – the steering is
numb despite of old-fashioned hydraulic assistance; the ZF transmission
reacts to manual gearchange with a noticeable delay, as if it struggles
to cope with so much torque; the W12 engine is undeniably powerful but
its induction and exhaust note lacks any aural character. In fact, the
new 4.0-liter bi-turbo V8 sounds much much better.
That puzzles me. On the one hand, the Bentley provides astonishing
performance to attract keener kind of rich drivers. On the other hand,
it disappoints those people with its lack of driving thrills. If it
targets at back seat drivers, it would need a more comfort-biased
tuning instead of the extra performance. So what does it want to
achieve?
|
Verdict: |
Published
on 10
Jul 2014 |
All rights reserved.
|
|
Flying Spur V8
|
In response to the
global trend of cutting emission, Volkswagen group loses interest in
its complicated W12 engines. Today, Bentley becomes the sole consumer
(apart from a handful of Audi A8 W12) of the W12. This is why the
production of the engine has been shifted from Germany to England
recently. Even so, Bentley itself is also turning attention to smaller
V8. Since the Continental GT received the Audi-sourced 4-liter
twin-turbo V8 last year, the V8 has been taking more than half the
sales – and the share is rising again this year. Moreover, its smaller
displacement enjoys lower tax rate in China, now ties with USA as the
company’s largest market. Predictably, the Flying Spur limousine is
also set to receive the same engine option.
When you select Flying Spur with V8 instead of W12, you save not only
£10,000 but also 26 percent of fuel and 50 kg of weight – 30 kg
comes from the engine alone. You do sacrifice some 118 horsepower and
104 pound-foot of torque, but 507 hp and 486 lbft are more than decent
for a luxury limousine, as are the 183 mph top speed and sub-5-seconds
0-60 mph acceleration. The rest of the car is basically unchanged from
the W12 model.
As we found out in the Continental GT, the V8 is actually a better
motor than W12. Its lighter weight – located completely fore of the
front axle, remember – lessens the nose-heavy feel a little and lets
the car to turn-in a bit more eager. You are not aware of the reduced
power on the road because its twin-scroll turbos (thanks to the
inverse-breathing architecture) spool up more quickly. The reduced peak
torque seems to let the ZF 8-speed auto to respond quicker, although
there is still more delay than the same transmission fitted to Audi,
BMW or Jaguar. Most important, in place of the flat exhaust note of the
W12 is a good old V8 bubble once you open throttle wide. On the other
hand, drive it leisurely and the V8 is quiet and refined. The cylinder
deactivation facility is perfectly engineered, producing no intruding
noise and vibration in the transition between 8 and 4-cylinder modes.
That said, the V8 model still suffers from the same identity crisis as
the existing Flying Spur. On the one hand, it is not as comfortable to
ride as a Mercedes S500, or to lesser extent a Rolls-Royce Phantom,
because its air suspension fails to isolate bumps and road
imperfections as well, and the sound insulation is not as effective.
Its interior, while impeccably trimmed with wood and leather, does not
have the high-tech features and convenience of the new German luxury
leader. On the other hand, it is not as good to drive as an S63 AMG or
Jaguar XJR. Its sheer size and weight, soft suspension and numb
steering still handicap its handling on interesting roads, leaving
arrow-straight highways the only places to excel. While the V8 is
better than the W12, it doesn't change the fact that the Flying Spur is
not a class leader.
|
Verdict: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flying Spur V8 (V8 S)
|
2014
(2017)
|
Front-engined,
4WD |
Steel monocoque |
Steel + aluminum + composite
|
5299 / 1924 / 1488 mm |
3066 mm |
V8, 90-degree
|
3993 cc |
DOHC 32 valves, DVVT
|
Twin-turbo |
DI, cylinder deactivation |
507 hp (528 hp)
|
486 lbft (502 lbft)
|
8-speed automatic
|
F: double-wishbone
R: multi-link
|
Adaptive air spring + damping
|
275/45ZR19
|
2425 kg
|
183 mph (c) (190 mph (c))
|
4.9 (c) (4.3**)
|
(10.5**)
|
|
Flying Spur W12
|
2013
|
Front-engined,
4WD |
Steel monocoque |
Steel + aluminum + composite
|
5299 / 1924 / 1488 mm |
3066 mm |
W12
|
5998 cc |
DOHC 48 valves, DVVT
|
Twin-turbo |
- |
625 hp
|
590 lbft
|
8-speed automatic
|
F: double-wishbone
R: multi-link
|
Adaptive air spring + damping
|
275/45ZR19
|
2475 kg
|
200 mph (c)
|
4.3 (c) / 4.5*
|
9.5 (c) / 10.4*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance
tested by: *Autocar, **C&D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright©
1997-2013
by Mark Wan @ AutoZine
|
|