Here
in Hong Kong, Galant is one of the top sellers of the segment. Not so
in
America or Europe, where Galant is a rather rare sight. Commercially
speaking
it is not very successful, but I do think car industry needs more such
cars instead of our average Camry. Why? because Mitsubishi Galant has
its
own character. Looking from outside you'll know it's designed by
somebody
with enthusiastic mind. Aggressive, sharp, with a lots of distinctive
features.
Isn't that 2 outside-faced headlamps and front bumper inspired Honda
S2000
? Putting this Galant into the same showroom as the organic Carisma
must
presents the greatest contrast. More clearly speaking, men versus women.
While
the exterior design catches my heart, the interior receives no less
praise.
Although it doesn't have Volkswagen's build quality, it rivals well
with
the best of others in terms of fit and finish. Remember, it is built in
Japan instead of Holland. The styling of dashboard is also far more
handsome
than most Japanese sedans, matching the aggressive exterior very well.
There is sufficient of space - roughly equals to Camry and 406 but
marginally
eclipsed by Passat and American Accord. Seats, driving position and
ergonomics
of controls are all in Japanese standard, so is reliability.
What
makes the Galant unique is not only the styling, it also includes the
engines.
Don't be surprised, Mitsubishi offers no less than 7 petrol engines for
the Galant, and some of them features very interesting technology.
For
Japan:
- 1.8-litre
GDI four-pot: this is the most commonly used GDI engine in Mitsubishi's
range. Rated 140 hp in JIS.
- 2.4-litre
GDI four-pot: this long-stroke engine came from Space Wagon (Grandis)
and
now powers the top-spec Galant in Japan. It is rated at 165 hp in JIS
and
a V6-challenging 170 lbft of torque.
For
East
Asia:
- 2-litre
MIVEC V6: this compact V6 came directly from the FTO coupe. The
variable
valve timing and twin-cam heads help it to achieve a full 200
horsepower
output, although it desperately needs rev and 5-speed manual to
compensate
the lack of torque. It is installed in the Galant VR-M which is
expected
to phase out next year.
For
Europe:
- 2-litre
dohc four-pot: base engine. 136 hp.
- 2.4-litre
GDI four-pot: differs from the Japanese 2.4 GDI by the reduction of
air-fuel
mixture ratio for adapting to European fuel. Rated 150 hp in DIN.
- 2.5-litre
sohc V6: smooth and quiet. For effortless driving. 161 hp.
For
USA:
- 2.4-litre
four-pot: the 145 hp engine is built in the USA and also supply
Chrysler.
- 3.0-litre
sohc V6: 195 hp and 205 lbft, sufficient to rival Accord and Camry.
For
transmission,
Mitsubishi offers several versions of its Invecs-II auto gearbox. All
of
them feature adaptive shift program by means of Fuzzy logic control
(just
like my rice cooker). Without surprise, the Japanese Galant gets the
most
advanced box, with 5 ratios and the so-called "Sports Mode" control,
that
is, Tiptronic style manual control. Stuck in traffic, the auto mode is
undoubtedly most suitable. When the traffic gets clear, push the gear
level
to the left column (for RHD cars) and then you can use the + and -
pattern
to upshift and downshift manually. It's clear and no fuzzy at all !
although
it is incomparable to Alfa's Selespeed in terms of speed, it is already
better than all its direct competitors which are only provided with
conventional
automatic transmission.
Again,
the best thing is reserved for Asian. What the European gets is the
4-speed
version, which is probably unsold stock. Yet it is already superior to
the American Galant's 4A without Sport Mode. 5-speed manual is offered
for all models except American's V6.
When
comes to chassis, the Galant's win hand is finally
down. Driving leisurely,
its soft suspensions ride smoothly while the light steering aids
driving
ease. However, assessing a car's handling requires pushing it towards
the
limit, then you'll find the Galant rolls too much while steering feel
is
fading out. Soon the car is prone to understeer and runs wide. Compare
with European benchmarks, namely 406, Passat, Mondeo and Primera, the
Mitsubishi
bias towards comfort instead of handling, yet it ultimately can't match
the suppleness of 406 or the fluency of Passat, because its soft
suspensions
were somewhat set up to compensate the lack of chassis stiffness. Tha's
why on the most demanding road, the European benchmarks feel not only
more
sure-footed but also more refined, with less suspension noise
generated.
There
is a sportier version called GTZ on sale in the USA, which has
marginally
stiffer suspension, rear spoiler and funny white-face gauges. However,
it doesn't improve handling by too much so that some American
journalists
still prefer Accord's handling.
That�s
in the keen driver's point of view. For the majority of family men and
women, Galant is still competent enough. Considering the poor Camry can
satisfy the most American families, I can't see why the Galant cannot.
|